Merely stating that the Accused-Appellant has mentally harassed the complainant-Respondent No. 2 with respect to a demand of dowry does not fulfil the ingredients of Section 498A ...

But what is important is that mutation does not confer any right, title or interest on a person. Mutation in the revenue records is only for fiscal purposes MANU/SC/0684/2021, therefore, where there ...

19. In light of the discussion above, the impugned order of the High Court dismissing the revision as having abated on death of the revisionist is held unsustainable in law. More so, because the trial ...

Expert legal help, exam prep, & top court judgments. Trusted by judges, lawyers, & students.

A remand directing attention to specific precedent is not a mandate to ignore the law’s subsequent evolution. Appellate ...

The appellant was arrested on 30.12.2024 in connection with FIR No. 33/2022 registered under Sections 384, 420, 468, 471, 509 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and remanded to police custody for ...

The Argument In Pradeep Sharma vs. ED, the defense presented a clever argument: the PMLA could not be applied retrospectively to a bribe allegedly taken years before the law was enacted in its current ...

Stage 2: Disciplinary Inquiry. The preliminary report is then sent to the accused's Disciplinary Authority. The accused's own department initiates formal disciplinary action based on that report, with ...

Courts have long held that mere receipt of money obtained through cheating does not implicate a recipient as an accused unless evidence shows they: The burden lies on the prosecution to demonstrate ...

15. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the complainantrespondent No.2 contended that the FIR and Complaint Case preferred by her is not a counter-blast to the legal notice sent by the ...

2. The applications have approached this Court for being released on bail in C.R. No. 38 of 2003 registered at Gadhinglaj Police Station under Sections 498-A, 307, 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal ...

Citation: MANU/MH/1593/2003, 2004 ALLMR (CRI) 646. 1. Heard learned Counsel Mr. Bhangde, as well as Mr. Sonare, learned A.P.P. for the respondent/State. 2. The applicant had filed application below ...