Opinion: We need leaders who respect the Constitution and the balance of power it enshrines, not those who seek to dismantle it for political gain.

Article III of the Constitution establishes that the Supreme Court rules, as the Supreme Court ruled in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Times headline was an inside joke. Readers wouldn’t get it ...

Donald Trump is our lawfully elected president. But he can't run roughshod over the U.S. Constitution, explains Michigan ...

The Framers understood that part of human nature is to amass, entrench and ultimately abuse power, so there must be ...

Trump is different. His defiance lies in plain view. There is no dignity. There is no restraint. There is only power. The ...

"The foundation of judicial review is based on this very premise," one expert noted, referring to Marbury v. Madison in the US and Pir Sabir Shah in Pakistan. The experts suggested that the bench ...

It’s reasonable to see the nation’s and the world’s attention focused on Donald J. Trump’s second inauguration.

So rank is the partisanship of the N.C. Supreme Court that one of its new Republican members has effectively announced it’s too much for him. | Opinion ...

If sports teams don’t get to choose the referees in a game, why should political parties get to support candidates in a judicial election? It’s really not that different.

The oath of the President is well known. “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, ...